Practice Areas
Maritime Arbitration and Mediation
Sativale Mathew Arun
(406) 555-0120
Maritime Arbitration
Maritime Arbitration whereby parties have their disputes determined by impartial individuals chosen or agreed by them outside the national court systems is encouraged in Malaysia and given statutory force in the Arbitration Act 2005. Giving effect to the principles set out in UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985, the Act reflects international consensus on arbitration law and practice and establishes a special regime for the resolution of international and domestic disputes. It covers all stages of the arbitral process from the arbitration agreement, composition and jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, conduct of arbitral process, the residual power and extent of court intervention, recourse against an award through to recognition and enforcement. Unless contrary to public policy, the any subject matter can be determined by arbitration.
Malaysia is a state party to the New York Convention, an international treaty with over 140 member nations facilitating a uniform mechanism for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in member states. National courts are required to aid and not interfere with the arbitral process (except on restricted grounds) and empowered to stay court proceedings brought in violation of a valid arbitration agreement. Maritime claimants, through the High Court’s admiralty process, may proceed to arrest ships owned by defendants found in Malaysian waters to secure their claim in pending arbitration proceedings.
The Partners of the Firm regularly act as arbitrators or counsels for parties in maritime related disputes in both domestic and international arbitration, and in particular, are experienced in the conduct of institutionalized arbitration held under the auspices of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC); Palm Refiners Association of Malaysia (PORAM); London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA); Federation of Oils, Seeds and Fats Association, London (FOSFA); Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC); Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration (SCMA); and Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).
The Firm frequently is called upon to institute admiralty arrest of defendant’s vessel to obtain security pending arbitration proceedings; for registration and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and for resisting foreign arbitral awards in Malaysia where circumstances allow.
Maritime Mediation
Mediation is a structured voluntary negotiation process in which a neutral independent person, known as a mediator, assists the parties to identify and assess options, and facilitates an agreement that may be reached by the parties to resolve their dispute. It is an alternative to a determination of the dispute by a Judge or arbitrator who imposes a decision on the parties.
The mediation itself is flexible and can be tailored to suit the circumstances of each case. Mediators may assist negotiations by asking questions, encouraging open joint discussion or through private sessions, offering different perspectives and expressing issues in alternative ways. Parties may be encouraged to identify and test the consequences of potential solutions. It is common for the mediator to meet with the parties jointly and separately, and further mediation sessions can be scheduled if necessary.
Generally, all maritime claims brought in the Court or Arbitration, regardless of their complexity or number of parties, are eligible to be referred to mediation. The following factors, among others, may indicate whether the dispute is particularly suited to mediation:-
(a) willingness of parties to participate in mediation;
(b) need for parties to find a way to preserve their relationship;
(c) existence of non-monetary factors;
(d) possibility for a negotiated outcome that better suits the needs and interests of the parties than a Judge or Arbitrator’s determination; and
(e) possibility that a Judge or Arbitrator’s determination will not end the dispute.
If agreement is reached about part or all of the dispute, the details of that agreement will usually be recorded and signed by all parties before the end of mediation. Once the agreement is finalised, the parties will normally notify the Court or Arbitral Tribunal of the settlement and proceedings will be discontinued by consent of the parties.
Mediation offers many benefits over a trial by a Judge or Arbitrator, including saving of time and costs as compared to a protracted litigation with appeals, flexibility in that parties have more control over the outcome, less formal and stressful than appearing in Court, confidentiality of the subject matter of the dispute is preserved, parties are more likely to be satisfied with the result and to comply with the settlement terms as agreed by all parties.
The Partners of the Firm frequently is called upon by the parties to act as a Mediator or to act as a counsel for a party in the mediation process involving maritime disputes.
Contact person:
The information herein is for general guidance only, may have been superseded, circumstances may have changed and should not be relied upon for action. This does not in any way represent or replace professional legal advice which in each and every case must be obtained.
Other Practice Areas
Get in Touch
We’re happy to hear about and legal work you need. Use the contact box below and we’ll get back to you.
- No. 6, Jalan SS 15/8B, Subang Jaya, 47500 Selangor, Malaysia
- +603-5633 8787
- sma@sativale.com.my